BrowseNavigationPoll |
Odiumjunkie's Slashdot CommentsSubmitted by phil on November 19, 2007 - 2:56pm.
what a load of fucking horseshit >Recently there has been a sharp increase in the amount of abusive language on the New Scientist website. Oh, how very fucking _interesting_! Sounds just like the kind of impartial, thoughtful introduction that heralds a fucking well-balanced scientific curio doesn't it? It's on an intellectual par with Schrödinger postulating about quantum mechanics because his damned cat wouldn't stop shitting on the carpet. Bra-fucking-vo. >My pet theory about why people behave so rudely is that online commenting is treated, by most people, like a pub conversation Oh yeah? Well _my_ pet theory is that you're fucking retarded. What's your local pub? The "make up spurious claims & expect people to be interested in them"? >After being described a few weeks ago as "a self-lobotomised liberal who can't face the facts", I decided to look into the psychology of online behaviour a bit further. Submitted by springbox on August 8, 2007 - 8:13am.
Re:Bring Down A Website In Six Words I discovered a weird IE bug... there are six words that, when included on a webpage, stop IE ever being used on that computer again: get Submitted by veridicus on June 27, 2007 - 10:06am.
Well, Microsoft's HR is working hard ... or hardly working. Re:HR at work Hehe, that was funny... or really lame. Submitted by veridicus on January 3, 2007 - 3:45pm.
will make for some interesting "Talk:" pages This advert is CLEARLY not NPOV. Can we get a citation on the shampoo making hair "glossy and full of bounce"? 84.28.125.19 WTF I USE IT AND IT MAKES MY HAIR GLOSSY 61.101.19.42 Hey no original research you nub 69.120.51.20 Do we having anything on "glossy and full of bounce" as opposed to just glossy? 84.28.125.19 OK HAVE REWRITTEN ARTICLE TO CLEAN UP, NOW "SHINY AND NATURALLY SOFT", NOT "GLOSSY AND FULL OF BOUNCE" 61.101.19.42 nominated for deletion, 01/02/07, not noteworthy enough 83.102.48.18 |